"The policy simply embeds discrimination in public services, eroding carefully cultivated relationships which rely on trust, and fosters a culture of self-censorship," Liberty said.īut Peter Neumann, a professor of security studies at King's College London, said scrapping Prevent is not the answer. A proper independent review would look at the human rights violations involved.īut it's clear that the govt wants a whitewash. We stand united in boycotting the Prevent review.įor years, Prevent has had a discriminatory and anti-Muslim impact. Liberty, one of the campaign groups that signed the letter, has called for the "fundamentally misconceived" scheme to be scrapped, arguing ministers have not "published any evidence that holding extreme views is a reliable predictor of future participation in violence". In a joint letter, the organisations said they have "long raised concerns about the discriminatory and anti-Muslim impact of Prevent and its potential to violate core human rights". Of these 43% were to do with extreme right-wing radicalisation (302), 30% were related to Islamist radicalisation (210), 18% were classified as MUU ideology (127) and the remaining 8% were to do with other radicalisation concerns (58).īetween 20, 2,352 individuals identified as vulnerable to radicalisation were supported by Prevent.Ĭritics of Prevent argue it is counterproductive and does not work, sowing distrust within the Muslim community in particular.Ī coalition of 17 groups announced earlier this year that they would be boycotting the independent review of Prevent. Most of the referrals came from the police (1,950, 31%) and the education sector (1,928, 31%), while more than half were for individuals aged 20 and under (54%) and the overwhelming majority were males (88%).Ī total of 51% of the referrals were related to MUU ideologies, 24% to Islamist radicalisation and 22% to extreme right-wing radicalisation.Ī total of 1,424 cases went to a "Channel Panel", of which 697 were progressed further. This is a 10% increase from the previous year (5,737). In the year ending 31 March 2020, 6,287 referrals relating to 6,068 individuals were made to Prevent. Getting in touch with these authorities will not get the person in trouble if no criminal offence has taken place.Ī referral does not show up on criminal records checks and has no bearing on the individual's future prospects.
If an individual wants to get advice before referring someone, they can speak to a range of people, including a local authority safeguarding team, a teacher, healthcare provider or another trusted authority. Participation in Channel is voluntary, while those who are referred to Prevent have to give consent (through a parent or guardian if they are underage) before they can be given support. This support works in a similar way to programmes designed to protect people from gang activity, drug or sexual abuse.įollow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker If it is established that there is a genuine risk of radicalisation, the case is considered by a "Channel Panel'', a multi-agency group of professionals who assess the risk and decide on a package of support to offer the individual.
If someone is deemed to represent a security threat, they will be referred to the police for further inquiries. If the individual is found to not be at risk of radicalisation, the case is closed. Once one has been made, initial checks are carried out.
U pro mp how to#
Training is provided for people in these settings to recognise signs of possible radicalisation and how to meet this duty.Īll referrals are handled by expert officers in local police forces. It means people who work in these sectors are required to report people they suspect are vulnerable to extremism. This includes councils, schools, universities, healthcare, prisons and probation and the police.
0 kommentar(er)
